Gilbert v. United States, 998 F. 3d 410 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2021 FIRPTA and the FDAP rules
Category: Federal
The Dutra Group v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 2275 – Supreme Court 2019 The seaman’s right to recover damages for
Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 US 527 – Supreme Court 1995 A federal
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), makes it unlawful “for any person . .
GOOGLE LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1183 – Supreme Court 2021 Copyright and patents, the Constitution says,
From Skidmore v. ZEPPELIN, 952 F. 3d 1051 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2020 I. THE 1909 COPYRIGHT ACT
SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, ET AL.,v.GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. No. 19A1044. Supreme Court of the United
Quid Pro Quo The essence of the quid pro quo theory of sexual harassment is that an individual “relies upon
To state a prima facie case of FMLA retaliation (circumstantial), an employee must show that: (1) he engaged in a
Title VII and the FEHA prohibit employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in certain protected activities. See 42 U.S.C.