Introduction to the Case In the annals of American history, few cases resonate as deeply as that of Nicola Sacco
Category: Discrimination
Introduction to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Greetings to our blog, dedicated to the exploration of
(A) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer or former employer to include in any agreement related to an
HIRAISHI v. DeLEON, Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dist., 6th Div. 2022 The California Fair Employment and Housing Act
CACI No. 2509. “Adverse Employment Action” Explained [Name of plaintiff] must prove that [he/she/nonbinary pronoun] was subjected to an adverse
A successful plaintiff under FEHA may recover the following: back pay (also referred to as back wages or lost earnings) (see Govt C
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (as well as Title VII) makes it an unlawful employment practice for
Per the SEC Rule 701 exempts certain sales of securities made to compensate employees, consultants and advisors. This exemption is not available
Quid Pro Quo The essence of the quid pro quo theory of sexual harassment is that an individual “relies upon
Title VII and the FEHA prohibit employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in certain protected activities. See 42 U.S.C.